🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" policies pose an existential risk to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective rests on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge facing Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% growth for the EU. During this time, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Today, about 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

This widening disparity stems from stronger productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology leadership is decidedly US-centric. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at over $10bn, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap prompts a pressing question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race between the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several key factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine unified investment market, a factor that limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a product under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to propose substantial change. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of major reforms.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains considerable strengths: skilled workforce, excellent schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a critical moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's technological decline has been steady. But, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.